Comments on: Wicket-Guice and Warp-Persist http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/ Just another WordPress weblog Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:10:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: VK http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-6392 VK Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:14:38 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-6392 i have not found out any drawbacks yet, it works, and works faster. i agree, or maybe GuiceComponentInjector should be deprecated. i have not found out any drawbacks yet, it works, and works faster.

i agree, or maybe GuiceComponentInjector should be deprecated.

]]> By: Richard http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-6299 Richard Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:33:26 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-6299 I'm curious as to why another superior injector was created, instead of improving the current one. Does InjectionFlagCachingGuiceComponentInjector have any drawbacks? If not then maybe InjectionFlagCachingGuiceComponentInjector should be Deprecated and the better code be moved into GuiceComponentInjector? Richard I’m curious as to why another superior injector was created, instead of improving the current one. Does InjectionFlagCachingGuiceComponentInjector have any drawbacks?

If not then maybe InjectionFlagCachingGuiceComponentInjector should be Deprecated and the better code be moved into GuiceComponentInjector?

Richard

]]> By: VK http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-6295 VK Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:35:21 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-6295 Do not use GuiceComponentInjector, rather use InjectionFlagCachingGuiceComponentInjector and get up to 10x better performance. Do not use GuiceComponentInjector, rather use InjectionFlagCachingGuiceComponentInjector and get up to 10x better performance.

]]> By: Wicket, Guice 2.0, Warp-persist 2.0 — AtomicGamer Dev Blog http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-5806 Wicket, Guice 2.0, Warp-persist 2.0 — AtomicGamer Dev Blog Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:39:14 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-5806 [...] 1.0 releases of Guice and Warp-persist. And really, most of what I did I got from blog 1 and blog 2. The current Warp-persist 2.0 docs are a [...] [...] 1.0 releases of Guice and Warp-persist. And really, most of what I did I got from blog 1 and blog 2. The current Warp-persist 2.0 docs are a [...]

]]> By: More Warped Wicket | Richards Blog http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-20 More Warped Wicket | Richards Blog Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:20:45 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-20 [...] this year I wrote a post on integrating wicket and warp persist, and I thought it was about time I posted an update, but this time I included working example [...] [...] this year I wrote a post on integrating wicket and warp persist, and I thought it was about time I posted an update, but this time I included working example [...]

]]> By: Peter Mularien http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-19 Peter Mularien Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:29:59 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-19 Thanks for the post! I admit it's been a while since I've picked up wrap-persist and Guice, but it's nice to see a good intro like yours show up :) Thanks for the post! I admit it’s been a while since I’ve picked up wrap-persist and Guice, but it’s nice to see a good intro like yours show up :)

]]> By: admin http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-18 admin Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:54:32 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-18 I saw it in your docs that the filter should come first, its just the other post I read said it should come after the wicket one, so that's where the confusion came from. A wicket-specific section might have helped, but to be honest the thing that slowed me down was not realising that I needed to pass the Guice injector into the wicket-guice Component Listener. I saw it in your docs that the filter should come first, its just the other post I read said it should come after the wicket one, so that’s where the confusion came from.
A wicket-specific section might have helped, but to be honest the thing that slowed me down was not realising that I needed to pass the Guice injector into the wicket-guice Component Listener.

]]> By: Dhanji R. Prasanna http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/19/wicket-guice-and-warp-persist/#comment-17 Dhanji R. Prasanna Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:00:02 +0000 http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/?p=15#comment-17 Hi Glad you like warp-persist =) I mention in the docs that the filter must appear above other filters (I should probably make it clearer). The maven repo is also something I have been meaning to do for some time. Would a wicket-specific doc-section have helped? Can't wait to see your experience with Dynamic Finders! Dhanji. Hi

Glad you like warp-persist =)

I mention in the docs that the filter must appear above other filters (I should probably make it clearer). The maven repo is also something I have been meaning to do for some time.
Would a wicket-specific doc-section have helped?

Can’t wait to see your experience with Dynamic Finders!

Dhanji.

]]>